Today on Superior Sequels we’re talking about the best trilogy ever made (as far as I’m concerned anyway).
Back to the Future (1985) vs Back to the Future Part II (1989) vs Back to the Future Part III (1990).
For me, as good as all three films are there’s no contest. The first is the clear winner - BUT, I know that a lot of people consider one, or even both of the sequels to be superior.
So which is King?
Is it the original 50s-based time travelling adventure, the future-set (actually now the past) first sequel, or the old west/gun-slinging finale?
Have your say in the comments below.